Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Takahashi TOA-150B

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-150B
Takahashi

TOA-150B

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-27% focal length
-33% aperture
Slower by 0.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZTakahashi TOA-150B
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteApo triplet
Aperture100mm150mm
Focal length800mm1100mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/7.3
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg13.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Wider field — 800mm vs 1100mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 13.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Tighter framing — 1100mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 50% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/7.3 vs f/8
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Takahashi TOA-150B
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi TOA-150B — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.88° × 1.25°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 0.82°Scale: 0.71"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.59° × 0.59°Scale: 0.71"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-150B — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives