Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-20% focal length
-23% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZTakahashi TOA-130NFB
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteApo triplet
Aperture100mm130mm
Focal length800mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/7.7
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg9.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Wider field — 800mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 9.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 30% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives