Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Takahashi Epsilon-180ED

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-180ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

+60% focal length
-44% aperture
Slower by 5.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZTakahashi Epsilon-180ED
Optics
Typerefractorastrograph
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteHyperbolic Newtonian
Aperture100mm180mm
Focal length800mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/2.8
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg12.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 500mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 12.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Wider field — 500mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 80% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.8 vs f/8
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives