Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DZ vs Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED102 FCD-100

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+12% focal length
Slower by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DZExplore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteApo triplet FCD-100
Aperture100mm102mm
Focal length800mm714mm
Native f/ratiof/8.0f/7.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg5.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 714mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 5.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
  • Wider field — 714mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/8
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.89° × 1.93°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.89° × 1.26°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.91° × 0.91°Scale: 1.09"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Explore Scientific ED102 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives