telescopecomparison · 2-way
Takahashi FC-100DL vs Stellarvue SVX102T
Takahashi
FC-100DL
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Stellarvue
SVX102T
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Key differences
+26% focal length
Slower by 2.0 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Takahashi FC-100DL | Stellarvue SVX102T |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet fluorite | Apo triplet |
| Aperture | 100mm | 102mm |
| Focal length | 900mm | 714mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/9.0 | f/7.0 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 52mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 3.3kg | 6.5kg |
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DL
- Tighter framing — 900mm vs 714mm focal length
- Lighter (3.3kg vs 6.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX102T
- Wider field — 714mm vs 900mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/7 vs f/9
- Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DL
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Stellarvue SVX102T
- Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Stellarvue SVX102T — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.89° × 1.93°Scale: 1.09"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.89° × 1.26°Scale: 1.09"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 0.91° × 0.91°Scale: 1.09"/px
Takahashi FC-100DL — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Stellarvue SVX102T — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.