Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi FC-100DL vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT

Takahashi FC-100DL
Takahashi

FC-100DL

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Astro-Tech

AT115EDT

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+12% focal length
-13% aperture
Slower by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi FC-100DLAstro-Tech AT115EDT
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet fluoriteApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture100mm115mm
Focal length900mm805mm
Native f/ratiof/9.0f/7.0
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.3kg6.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Tighter framing — 900mm vs 805mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 6.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Wider field — 805mm vs 900mm focal length
  • 15% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/9
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DL
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi FC-100DL — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.29° × 1.53°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.50° × 1.00°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.72° × 0.72°Scale: 0.86"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
Takahashi FC-100DL — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives