Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-180ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-6% focal length
+70% aperture
Faster by 2.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-180EDTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
TypeastrographRefractor
Optical designHyperbolic NewtonianPetzval APO
Aperture180mm106mm
Focal length500mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/2.8f/5.0
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight12.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • 70% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/2.8 vs f/5
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 12.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-180ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-180ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a permanent observatory setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives