Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs Tele Vue NP127fli

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP127fli
Tele Vue

NP127fli

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-20% focal length
+26% aperture
Faster by 1.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDTele Vue NP127fli
Optics
TypeNewtonianrefractor
Optical designHyperbolic astrographNagler-Petzval
Aperture160mm127mm
Focal length530mm660mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/5.2
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.0kg9.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 660mm focal length
  • 26% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5.2
Advantages of Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Tighter framing — 660mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Tele Vue NP127fli
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Tele Vue NP127fli — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.08°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.04° × 1.36°Scale: 1.18"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.98° × 0.98°Scale: 1.18"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Tele Vue NP127fli — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives