Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+51% aperture
Faster by 1.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
TypeNewtonianRefractor
Optical designHyperbolic astrographPetzval APO
Aperture160mm106mm
Focal length530mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/5.0
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.0kg7.5kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • 51% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives