Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs Takahashi FC-100DZ

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FC-100DZ
Takahashi

FC-100DZ

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-34% focal length
+60% aperture
Faster by 4.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDTakahashi FC-100DZ
Optics
TypeNewtonianrefractor
Optical designHyperbolic astrographApo doublet fluorite
Aperture160mm100mm
Focal length530mm800mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/8.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight10.0kg3.3kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 800mm focal length
  • 60% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/8
Advantages of Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.3kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FC-100DZ
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi FC-100DZ — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FC-100DZ — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives