Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED vs Takahashi Epsilon-130D

Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
Takahashi

Epsilon-160ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-130D
Takahashi

Epsilon-130D

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+23% focal length
+23% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-160EDTakahashi Epsilon-130D
Optics
TypeNewtonianastrograph
Optical designHyperbolic astrographHyperbolic Newtonian
Aperture160mm130mm
Focal length530mm430mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/3.3
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight10.0kg7.8kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Tighter framing — 530mm vs 430mm focal length
  • 23% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 530mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.8kg vs 10kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-160ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-160ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi Epsilon-130D — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives