Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-130D vs William Optics GT 81

Takahashi Epsilon-130D
Takahashi

Epsilon-130D

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 81
William Optics

GT 81

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

-10% focal length
+60% aperture
Faster by 2.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-130DWilliam Optics GT 81
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designHyperbolic NewtonianApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture130mm81mm
Focal length430mm478mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/5.9
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.8kg3.8kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 478mm focal length
  • 60% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/5.9
Advantages of William Optics GT 81
  • Tighter framing — 478mm vs 430mm focal length
  • Lighter (3.8kg vs 7.8kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 81
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
William Optics GT 81 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.32° × 2.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.82° × 1.88°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics GT 81 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives