Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Takahashi Epsilon-130D vs Takahashi TOA-130NFB

Takahashi Epsilon-130D
Takahashi

Epsilon-130D

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB
Takahashi

TOA-130NFB

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-57% focal length
Faster by 4.4 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationTakahashi Epsilon-130DTakahashi TOA-130NFB
Optics
Typeastrographrefractor
Optical designHyperbolic NewtonianApo triplet
Aperture130mm130mm
Focal length430mm1000mm
Native f/ratiof/3.3f/7.7
Image circle44mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.8kg9.6kg
Advantages of Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Wider field — 430mm vs 1000mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/3.3 vs f/7.7
  • Lighter (7.8kg vs 9.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Tighter framing — 1000mm vs 430mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Takahashi Epsilon-130D
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi TOA-130NFB
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.80° × 3.20°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.13° × 2.09°Scale: 1.80"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.51°Scale: 1.80"/px
Takahashi TOA-130NFB — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Takahashi Epsilon-130D — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi TOA-130NFB — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives