Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Stellarvue SVX152T vs Stellarvue SVX102T

Stellarvue SVX152T
Stellarvue

SVX152T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX102T
Stellarvue

SVX102T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+68% focal length
+49% aperture
Slower by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationStellarvue SVX152TStellarvue SVX102T
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet
Aperture152mm102mm
Focal length1200mm714mm
Native f/ratiof/7.9f/7.0
Image circle60mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight14.0kg6.5kg
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Tighter framing — 1200mm vs 714mm focal length
  • 49% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX102T
  • Wider field — 714mm vs 1200mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.9
  • Lighter (6.5kg vs 14kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Stellarvue SVX102T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Stellarvue SVX152T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.72° × 1.15°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 0.75°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.54° × 0.54°Scale: 0.65"/px
Stellarvue SVX102T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.89° × 1.93°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.89° × 1.26°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.91° × 0.91°Scale: 1.09"/px
Stellarvue SVX152T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX102T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives