Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Stellarvue SVX152T vs Astro-Tech AT115EDT

Stellarvue SVX152T
Stellarvue

SVX152T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT
Astro-Tech

AT115EDT

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+49% focal length
+32% aperture
Slower by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationStellarvue SVX152TAstro-Tech AT115EDT
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture152mm115mm
Focal length1200mm805mm
Native f/ratiof/7.9f/7.0
Image circle60mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight14.0kg6.6kg
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Tighter framing — 1200mm vs 805mm focal length
  • 32% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Wider field — 805mm vs 1200mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/7 vs f/7.9
  • Lighter (6.6kg vs 14kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Stellarvue SVX152T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Astro-Tech AT115EDT
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Stellarvue SVX152T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.72° × 1.15°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.12° × 0.75°Scale: 0.65"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.54° × 0.54°Scale: 0.65"/px
Astro-Tech AT115EDT — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.56° × 1.71°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.67° × 1.12°Scale: 0.96"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.80° × 0.80°Scale: 0.96"/px
Stellarvue SVX152T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT115EDT — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives