Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV vs Stellarvue SVX102T

Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV
Stellarvue

SVX080T-3SV

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Stellarvue SVX102T
Stellarvue

SVX102T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-33% focal length
-22% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationStellarvue SVX080T-3SVStellarvue SVX102T
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet
Aperture80mm102mm
Focal length480mm714mm
Native f/ratiof/6.0f/7.0
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight4.5kg6.5kg
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV
  • Wider field — 480mm vs 714mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 6.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX102T
  • Tighter framing — 714mm vs 480mm focal length
  • 28% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Stellarvue SVX102T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Stellarvue SVX102T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.89° × 1.93°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.89° × 1.26°Scale: 1.09"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.91° × 0.91°Scale: 1.09"/px
Stellarvue SVX080T-3SV — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Stellarvue SVX102T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives