Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P vs Stellarvue SVX130T

Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 250P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX130T
Stellarvue

SVX130T

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+10% focal length
+92% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 250PStellarvue SVX130T
Optics
TypenewtonianRefractor
Optical designNewtonian astrographTriplet APO
Aperture250mm130mm
Focal length1000mm910mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle60mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight15.5kg10.0kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • 92% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of Stellarvue SVX130T
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (10kg vs 15.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Stellarvue SVX130T
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.06° × 1.38°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 0.90°Scale: 0.78"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.65° × 0.65°Scale: 0.78"/px
Stellarvue SVX130T — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.27° × 1.51°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.48° × 0.99°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.71° × 0.71°Scale: 0.85"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 250P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Stellarvue SVX130T — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives