Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs ZWO FF80 APO

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF80 APO
ZWO

FF80 APO

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+43% focal length
+150% aperture
Faster by 3.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PZWO FF80 APO
Optics
TypeNewtonianrefractor
Optical designImaging NewtonianApo doublet FCD-100
Aperture200mm80mm
Focal length800mm560mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/7.0
Image circle32mm44mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight10.5kg4.0kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 560mm focal length
  • 150% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/7
Advantages of ZWO FF80 APO
  • Wider field — 560mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4kg vs 10.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — ZWO FF80 APO
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
ZWO FF80 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.68° × 2.46°Scale: 1.38"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.40° × 1.61°Scale: 1.38"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.16° × 1.16°Scale: 1.38"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF80 APO — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives