Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs William Optics RedCat 91

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 91
William Optics

RedCat 91

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+61% focal length
+120% aperture
Faster by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PWilliam Optics RedCat 91
Optics
TypeNewtonianRefractor
Optical designImaging NewtonianPetzval APO
Aperture200mm91mm
Focal length800mm496mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/5.5
Image circle32mm45mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight10.5kg4.3kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 496mm focal length
  • 120% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5.45
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 91
  • Wider field — 496mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (45mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (4.3kg vs 10.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — William Optics RedCat 91
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
William Optics RedCat 91 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.16° × 2.77°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.71° × 1.81°Scale: 1.56"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.31° × 1.31°Scale: 1.56"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 91 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives