Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs William Optics RedCat 71

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 71
William Optics

RedCat 71

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+129% focal length
+182% aperture
Faster by 0.9 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PWilliam Optics RedCat 71
Optics
TypeNewtonianRefractor
Optical designImaging NewtonianPetzval APO
Aperture200mm71mm
Focal length800mm350mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/4.9
Image circle32mm45mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight10.5kg2.7kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 350mm focal length
  • 182% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/4.9
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 71
  • Wider field — 350mm vs 800mm focal length
  • Larger image circle (45mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (2.7kg vs 10.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — William Optics RedCat 71
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
William Optics RedCat 71 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.89° × 3.93°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.85° × 2.57°Scale: 2.22"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.85° × 1.85°Scale: 2.22"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

William Optics RedCat 71 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives