Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P vs Vaonis Stellina

Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 200P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina
Vaonis

Stellina

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+100% focal length
+150% aperture
Faster by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Quattro 200PVaonis Stellina
Optics
TypeNewtoniansmart-telescope
Optical designImaging NewtonianApo doublet all-in-one
Aperture200mm80mm
Focal length800mm400mm
Native f/ratiof/4.0f/5.0
Image circle32mm
Full-frame supportNoNo
Physical
Weight10.5kg11.2kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Tighter framing — 800mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 150% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5
  • Larger image circle (32mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Vaonis Stellina
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 800mm focal length
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Vaonis Stellina
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
Vaonis Stellina — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 200P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Vaonis Stellina — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives