telescopecomparison · 2-way
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P vs Borg 107FL
Sky-Watcher
Quattro 150P
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Borg
107FL
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+40% aperture
Faster by 1.6 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P | Borg 107FL |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | newtonian | refractor |
| Optical design | Newtonian astrograph | Apo doublet fluorite |
| Aperture | 150mm | 107mm |
| Focal length | 600mm | 600mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/4.0 | f/5.6 |
| Image circle | — | — |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 7.5kg | 3.5kg |
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
- 40% more light-gathering aperture
- Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5.6
Advantages of Borg 107FL
- Lighter (3.5kg vs 7.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Best for — Borg 107FL
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Borg 107FL — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.
Borg 107FL — recommended user
Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.