Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED vs Askar SQA85

Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Evostar 80ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Askar SQA85
Askar

SQA85

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+20% focal length
-6% aperture
Slower by 1.7 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Evostar 80EDAskar SQA85
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo doublet FPL-53Quadruplet astrograph FPL-51
Aperture80mm85mm
Focal length600mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/5.8
Image circle44mm52mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.8kg4.4kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED
  • Tighter framing — 600mm vs 500mm focal length
Advantages of Askar SQA85
  • Wider field — 500mm vs 600mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/7.5
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — Askar SQA85
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Askar SQA85 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Sky-Watcher Evostar 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Askar SQA85 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives