Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED vs Askar FRA500

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 82ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Askar FRA500
Askar

FRA500

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-9% aperture
Slower by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Evolux 82EDAskar FRA500
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo doublet FPL-53Petzval Quintuplet APO
Aperture82mm90mm
Focal length499mm500mm
Native f/ratiof/6.1f/5.6
Image circle44mm60mm
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight3.6kg5.4kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Lighter (3.6kg vs 5.4kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Askar FRA500
  • Faster optics at f/5.6 vs f/6.1
  • Larger image circle (60mm) — supports bigger sensors
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — Askar FRA500
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
Askar FRA500 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.75°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.69° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.29° × 1.29°Scale: 1.55"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Askar FRA500 — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives