telescopecomparison · 2-way
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED vs William Optics RedCat 61
Sky-Watcher
Evolux 62ED
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics
RedCat 61
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
Key differences
+20% focal length
Slower by 0.9 f-stops
Specifications
| Specification | Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED | William Optics RedCat 61 |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | refractor | Refractor |
| Optical design | Apo doublet FPL-53 | Petzval APO |
| Aperture | 62mm | 61mm |
| Focal length | 360mm | 300mm |
| Native f/ratio | f/5.8 | f/4.9 |
| Image circle | 44mm | 45mm |
| Full-frame support | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.2kg | 2.0kg |
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Tighter framing — 360mm vs 300mm focal length
Advantages of William Optics RedCat 61
- Wider field — 300mm vs 360mm focal length
- Faster optics at f/4.9 vs f/5.8
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
- Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Best for — William Optics RedCat 61
- Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
- Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
- Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
William Optics RedCat 61 — typical FOV & scale
- With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 6.88° × 4.58°Scale: 2.59"/px
- With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 4.49° × 3.00°Scale: 2.59"/px
- With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)FOV: 2.16° × 2.16°Scale: 2.59"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.
William Optics RedCat 61 — recommended user
Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.