Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED vs Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED

Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 80ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-27% focal length
-20% aperture
Faster by 0.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 80EDSky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APOTriplet APO
Aperture80mm100mm
Focal length400mm550mm
Native f/ratiof/5.0f/5.5
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight5.7kg8.6kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Wider field — 400mm vs 550mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/5.5
  • Lighter (5.7kg vs 8.6kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Tighter framing — 550mm vs 400mm focal length
  • 25% more light-gathering aperture
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.16° × 3.44°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.37° × 2.25°Scale: 1.94"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.62° × 1.62°Scale: 1.94"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 80ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives