Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 62ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+192% focal length
+142% aperture
Slower by 1.2 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 150EDSky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture150mm62mm
Focal length1050mm360mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.8
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight17.0kg2.2kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Tighter framing — 1050mm vs 360mm focal length
  • 142% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
  • Wider field — 360mm vs 1050mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.8 vs f/7
  • Lighter (2.2kg vs 17kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 5.73° × 3.82°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.74° × 2.50°Scale: 2.15"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.80°Scale: 2.15"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 62ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives