Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED vs SharpStar 76EDPH

Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 150ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 76EDPH
SharpStar

76EDPH

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+151% focal length
+97% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 150EDSharpStar 76EDPH
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APODoublet APO
Aperture150mm76mm
Focal length1050mm418mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.5
Image circle44mm42mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight17.0kg3.2kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Tighter framing — 1050mm vs 418mm focal length
  • 97% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of SharpStar 76EDPH
  • Wider field — 418mm vs 1050mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Lighter (3.2kg vs 17kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 76EDPH
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.96° × 1.31°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.28° × 0.86°Scale: 0.74"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.62° × 0.62°Scale: 0.74"/px
SharpStar 76EDPH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.93° × 3.29°Scale: 1.86"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.22° × 2.15°Scale: 1.86"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.55° × 1.55°Scale: 1.86"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 150ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

SharpStar 76EDPH — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives