Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED vs ZWO FF107 APO

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 120ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF107 APO
ZWO

FF107 APO

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+12% focal length
+12% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 120EDZWO FF107 APO
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOQuintuplet FCD-100
Aperture120mm107mm
Focal length840mm749mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight11.5kg7.2kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Tighter framing — 840mm vs 749mm focal length
  • 12% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of ZWO FF107 APO
  • Wider field — 749mm vs 840mm focal length
  • Lighter (7.2kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — ZWO FF107 APO
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.46° × 1.64°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.07°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.77° × 0.77°Scale: 0.92"/px
ZWO FF107 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.75° × 1.84°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.80° × 1.20°Scale: 1.04"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.86° × 0.86°Scale: 1.04"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

ZWO FF107 APO — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives