Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED vs SharpStar 61EDPH III

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 120ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 61EDPH III
SharpStar

61EDPH III

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+151% focal length
+97% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 120EDSharpStar 61EDPH III
Optics
TypeRefractorRefractor
Optical designTriplet APODoublet APO
Aperture120mm61mm
Focal length840mm335mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.5
Image circle44mm32mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight11.5kg2.4kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Tighter framing — 840mm vs 335mm focal length
  • 97% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 61EDPH III
  • Wider field — 335mm vs 840mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Lighter (2.4kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 61EDPH III
  • Wide-field nebulae and Milky Way regions
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.46° × 1.64°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.07°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.77° × 0.77°Scale: 0.92"/px
SharpStar 61EDPH III — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 6.16° × 4.11°Scale: 2.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.02° × 2.69°Scale: 2.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.93° × 1.93°Scale: 2.32"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 61EDPH III — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives