Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED vs Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet

Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 120ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
Meade

Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+75% focal length
+50% aperture
Slower by 1.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 120EDMeade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo triplet
Aperture120mm80mm
Focal length840mm480mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/6.0
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight11.5kg4.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Tighter framing — 840mm vs 480mm focal length
  • 50% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
  • Wider field — 480mm vs 840mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 11.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.46° × 1.64°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.07°Scale: 0.92"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.77° × 0.77°Scale: 0.92"/px
Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.30° × 2.86°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.81° × 1.87°Scale: 1.62"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.35° × 1.35°Scale: 1.62"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 120ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Meade Series 6000 80mm ED Triplet — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives