Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED vs Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Sky-Watcher

Quattro 150P

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

-8% focal length
-33% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 100EDSky-Watcher Quattro 150P
Optics
TypeRefractornewtonian
Optical designTriplet APONewtonian astrograph
Aperture100mm150mm
Focal length550mm600mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/4.0
Image circle44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight8.6kg7.5kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Larger image circle (44mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • 50% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/4 vs f/5.5
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.44° × 2.29°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.24° × 1.50°Scale: 1.29"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.08° × 1.08°Scale: 1.29"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Quattro 150P — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives