Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED vs Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED

Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
Sky-Watcher

Esprit 100ED

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Sky-Watcher

Evolux 82ED

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+10% focal length
+22% aperture
Faster by 0.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSky-Watcher Esprit 100EDSky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
Optics
TypeRefractorrefractor
Optical designTriplet APOApo doublet FPL-53
Aperture100mm82mm
Focal length550mm499mm
Native f/ratiof/5.5f/6.1
Image circle44mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesNo
Physical
Weight8.6kg3.6kg
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Tighter framing — 550mm vs 499mm focal length
  • 22% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/6.1
Advantages of Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Lighter (3.6kg vs 8.6kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.75° × 2.50°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.45° × 1.64°Scale: 1.41"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 1.18°Scale: 1.41"/px
Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 4.13° × 2.76°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.70° × 1.80°Scale: 1.55"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.30° × 1.30°Scale: 1.55"/px
Sky-Watcher Esprit 100ED — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Sky-Watcher Evolux 82ED — recommended user

Best suited for beginners and wide-field enthusiasts running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives