Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

SharpStar 140PH vs TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO

SharpStar 140PH
SharpStar

140PH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO
TS-Optics

PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+8% focal length
+8% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationSharpStar 140PHTS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Apo triplet FPL-53
Aperture140mm130mm
Focal length980mm910mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.0
Image circle52mm52mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg8.3kg
Advantages of SharpStar 140PH

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — SharpStar 140PH
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
SharpStar 140PH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.10° × 1.40°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.92°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.66°Scale: 0.79"/px
TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.27° × 1.51°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.48° × 0.99°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.71° × 0.71°Scale: 0.85"/px
SharpStar 140PH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

TS-Optics PHOTOLINE 130 f/7 APO — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives