Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

SharpStar 140PH vs Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4

SharpStar 140PH
SharpStar

140PH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Takahashi

FSQ-106EDX4

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+85% focal length
+32% aperture
Slower by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSharpStar 140PHTakahashi FSQ-106EDX4
Optics
TyperefractorRefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Petzval APO
Aperture140mm106mm
Focal length980mm530mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.0
Image circle52mm88mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg7.5kg
Advantages of SharpStar 140PH
  • Tighter framing — 980mm vs 530mm focal length
  • 32% more light-gathering aperture
Advantages of Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Wider field — 530mm vs 980mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5 vs f/7
  • Larger image circle (88mm) — supports bigger sensors
  • Lighter (7.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — SharpStar 140PH
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Fast imaging — short exposures per sub
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
SharpStar 140PH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.10° × 1.40°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.92°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.66°Scale: 0.79"/px
Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.89° × 2.59°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.54° × 1.70°Scale: 1.46"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.22° × 1.22°Scale: 1.46"/px
SharpStar 140PH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Takahashi FSQ-106EDX4 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives