Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

SharpStar 140PH vs SharpStar 94EDPH

SharpStar 140PH
SharpStar

140PH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 94EDPH
SharpStar

94EDPH

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+89% focal length
+49% aperture
Slower by 1.5 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationSharpStar 140PHSharpStar 94EDPH
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FPL-53Apo triplet FPL-53
Aperture140mm94mm
Focal length980mm518mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/5.5
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight9.5kg4.5kg
Advantages of SharpStar 140PH
  • Tighter framing — 980mm vs 518mm focal length
  • 49% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Wider field — 518mm vs 980mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/5.5 vs f/7
  • Lighter (4.5kg vs 9.5kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — SharpStar 140PH
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — SharpStar 94EDPH
  • Large emission nebulae and star clusters
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
SharpStar 140PH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.10° × 1.40°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.37° × 0.92°Scale: 0.79"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.66° × 0.66°Scale: 0.79"/px
SharpStar 94EDPH — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 3.98° × 2.65°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.60° × 1.74°Scale: 1.50"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.25° × 1.25°Scale: 1.50"/px
SharpStar 140PH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

SharpStar 94EDPH — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives