cameracomparison · 2-way
QHYCCD QHY600M vs QHYCCD QHY533M
QHYCCD
QHY533M
A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.
Key differences
171% larger sensor
578% more resolution
Specifications
| Specification | QHYCCD QHY600M | QHYCCD QHY533M |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | Dedicated Cooled | Dedicated Cooled |
| Sensor | Sony IMX455 | Sony IMX533 |
| Sensor tech | CMOS | CMOS |
| Format | Full Frame | 1" |
| Sensor size | 36.0×24.0mm | 11.3×11.3mm |
| Diagonal | 43.3mm | 16.0mm |
| Pixel size | 3.76µm | 3.76µm |
| Resolution | 9576×6388 | 3008×3008 |
| Megapixels | 61.0MP | 9.0MP |
| Color | No | No |
| Cooling | ||
| Cooled | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Full well | 51000e⁻ | 50000e⁻ |
| Peak QE | 91% | 80% |
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY600M
- Larger sensor (43.3mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
- Higher resolution (61MP vs 9MP)
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY533M
Closely matched on the compared specs.
Best for — QHYCCD QHY600M
- Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
- Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
- Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
- Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY533M
- Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
- Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
- Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
- Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY600M — typical FOV & scale
- On 250mm refractor (wide)FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.10"/px
- On 800mm SCT reducerFOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 0.97"/px
- On 2000mm SCT nativeFOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY533M — typical FOV & scale
- On 250mm refractor (wide)FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
- On 800mm SCT reducerFOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
- On 2000mm SCT nativeFOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY600M — recommended user
A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.
QHYCCD QHY533M — recommended user
A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.