Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M vs QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
QHYCCD

QHY5L-II-M

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C
QHYCCD

QHY5L-II-C

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

Mono vs color

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY5L-II-MQHYCCD QHY5L-II-C
Sensor
Typeguide-cameraguide-camera
SensorAptina AR0130Aptina AR0130
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/3"1/3"
Sensor size4.8×3.6mm4.8×3.6mm
Diagonal6.0mm6.0mm
Pixel size3.75µm3.75µm
Resolution1280×9601280×960
Megapixels1.2MP1.2MP
ColorNoYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well13000e⁻13000e⁻
Peak QE80%50%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Best for — QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.10° × 0.83°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.34° × 0.26°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.14° × 0.10°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.10° × 0.83°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.34° × 0.26°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.14° × 0.10°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-C — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives