Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY411M vs QHYCCD QHY183M

QHYCCD QHY411M
QHYCCD

QHY411M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

QHYCCD QHY183M
QHYCCD

QHY183M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

324% larger sensor
Larger pixels (3.76µm vs 2.4µm)
640% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY411MQHYCCD QHY183M
Sensor
Typededicateddedicated
SensorSony IMX411Sony IMX183
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatMedium format1"
Sensor size54.0×40.0mm13.2×8.8mm
Diagonal67.4mm15.9mm
Pixel size3.76µm2.40µm
Resolution14304×107485544×3684
Megapixels151.0MP20.4MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well80000e⁻15000e⁻
Peak QE90%84%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY411M
  • Larger sensor (67.4mm vs 15.9mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
  • Higher resolution (151MP vs 20.4MP)
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY183M
  • Finer sampling at 2.4µm pixels
Best for — QHYCCD QHY411M
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY183M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Planetary and lunar high-resolution imaging
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY411M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 12.38° × 9.17°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 3.87° × 2.87°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.55° × 1.15°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY183M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 3.03° × 2.02°Scale: 1.98"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.95° × 0.63°Scale: 0.62"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.38° × 0.25°Scale: 0.25"/px
QHYCCD QHY411M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

QHYCCD QHY183M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives