Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY410C vs Nikon Zf

QHYCCD QHY410C
QHYCCD

QHY410C

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Nikon Zf
Nikon

Zf

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Key differences

Cooled sensor

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY410CNikon Zf
Sensor
Typededicateddslr
SensorSony IMX410Nikon FX BSI
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull frameFull frame
Sensor size36.0×24.0mm35.9×23.9mm
Diagonal43.3mm43.1mm
Pixel size5.94µm5.94µm
Resolution6072×40426048×4032
Megapixels24.5MP24.5MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledYesNo
Performance
Full well73000e⁻
Peak QE88%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY410C
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
Advantages of Nikon Zf

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — QHYCCD QHY410C
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — Nikon Zf
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
QHYCCD QHY410C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 4.90"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.53"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.61"/px
Nikon Zf — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.23° × 5.48°Scale: 4.90"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.71°Scale: 1.53"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.68°Scale: 0.61"/px
QHYCCD QHY410C — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with wide-field refractors.

Nikon Zf — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Recommended alternatives