Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

QHYCCD QHY268M vs QHYCCD QHY533M

QHYCCD QHY268M
QHYCCD

QHY268M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

QHYCCD QHY533M
QHYCCD

QHY533M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

77% larger sensor
189% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationQHYCCD QHY268MQHYCCD QHY533M
Sensor
TypeDedicated CooledDedicated Cooled
SensorSony IMX571Sony IMX533
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatAPS-C1"
Sensor size23.5×15.7mm11.3×11.3mm
Diagonal28.3mm16.0mm
Pixel size3.76µm3.76µm
Resolution6280×42103008×3008
Megapixels26.0MP9.0MP
ColorNoNo
Cooling
CooledYesYes
Performance
Full well51000e⁻50000e⁻
Peak QE91%80%
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY268M
  • Larger sensor (28.3mm vs 16mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Higher resolution (26MP vs 9MP)
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY533M

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — QHYCCD QHY268M
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — QHYCCD QHY533M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
QHYCCD QHY268M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY533M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 2.59° × 2.59°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.81°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.32° × 0.32°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY268M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

QHYCCD QHY533M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives