Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Player One Poseidon-M Pro vs Sony A6700

Player One Poseidon-M Pro
Player One

Poseidon-M Pro

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Sony A6700
Sony

A6700

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

Cooled sensor
Mono vs color

Specifications

SpecificationPlayer One Poseidon-M ProSony A6700
Sensor
Typededicateddslr
SensorSony IMX571Sony APS-C BSI
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Sensor size23.5×15.7mm23.5×15.6mm
Diagonal28.3mm28.2mm
Pixel size3.76µm3.76µm
Resolution6248×41766192×4128
Megapixels26.1MP26.1MP
ColorNoYes
Cooling
CooledYesNo
Performance
Full well50000e⁻
Peak QE80%
Advantages of Player One Poseidon-M Pro
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Advantages of Sony A6700
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Best for — Player One Poseidon-M Pro
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Best for — Sony A6700
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Player One Poseidon-M Pro — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
Sony A6700 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.58°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
Player One Poseidon-M Pro — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Sony A6700 — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives