Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Player One Ceres-C vs QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M

Player One Ceres-C
Player One

Ceres-C

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
QHYCCD

QHY5L-II-M

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Key differences

Color vs mono

Specifications

SpecificationPlayer One Ceres-CQHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
Sensor
Typeguide-cameraguide-camera
SensorSony IMX224Aptina AR0130
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format1/3"1/3"
Sensor size4.9×3.7mm4.8×3.6mm
Diagonal6.1mm6.0mm
Pixel size3.75µm3.75µm
Resolution1304×9761280×960
Megapixels1.3MP1.2MP
ColorYesNo
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well19000e⁻13000e⁻
Peak QE75%80%
Advantages of Player One Ceres-C
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Best for — Player One Ceres-C
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Player One Ceres-C — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.12° × 0.85°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.35° × 0.27°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.14° × 0.11°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 1.10° × 0.83°Scale: 3.09"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 0.34° × 0.26°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.14° × 0.10°Scale: 0.39"/px
Player One Ceres-C — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

QHYCCD QHY5L-II-M — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Recommended alternatives