Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Pentax K-1 Mark II vs Canon EOS Ra Mark II

Pentax K-1 Mark II
Pentax

K-1 Mark II

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Canon EOS Ra Mark II
Canon

EOS Ra Mark II

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Key differences

Larger pixels (4.88µm vs 4.4µm)
-19% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationPentax K-1 Mark IICanon EOS Ra Mark II
Sensor
Typedslrdslr
SensorPentax FFCanon FF astro
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatFull frameFull frame
Sensor size35.9×24.0mm36.0×24.0mm
Diagonal43.2mm43.3mm
Pixel size4.88µm4.40µm
Resolution7360×49128192×5464
Megapixels36.4MP44.8MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well
Peak QE
Advantages of Pentax K-1 Mark II
  • Larger pixels — better low-light per-pixel sensitivity
Advantages of Canon EOS Ra Mark II
  • Higher resolution (44.8MP vs 36.4MP)
Best for — Pentax K-1 Mark II
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — Canon EOS Ra Mark II
  • Wide-field mosaics and full-frame telescopes
  • Fast, low-noise deep-sky at short focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Pentax K-1 Mark II — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.23° × 5.50°Scale: 4.03"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.57° × 1.72°Scale: 1.26"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.50"/px
Canon EOS Ra Mark II — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 8.25° × 5.50°Scale: 3.63"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 2.58° × 1.72°Scale: 1.13"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 1.03° × 0.69°Scale: 0.45"/px
Pentax K-1 Mark II — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Canon EOS Ra Mark II — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with wide-field refractors.

Recommended alternatives