Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

OM System OM-1 II vs Canon EOS R7

OM System OM-1 II
OM System

OM-1 II

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Canon EOS R7
Canon

EOS R7

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

-19% larger sensor
-38% more resolution

Specifications

SpecificationOM System OM-1 IICanon EOS R7
Sensor
Typedslrdslr
SensorOM System 4/3 stacked BSICanon APS-C
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
Format4/3"APS-C
Sensor size17.4×13.0mm22.3×14.8mm
Diagonal21.8mm26.8mm
Pixel size3.35µm3.20µm
Resolution5184×38886960×4640
Megapixels20.1MP32.5MP
ColorYesYes
Cooling
CooledNoNo
Performance
Full well
Peak QE
Advantages of OM System OM-1 II

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Advantages of Canon EOS R7
  • Larger sensor (26.8mm vs 21.8mm diagonal) — wider field
  • Higher resolution (32.5MP vs 20.1MP)
Best for — OM System OM-1 II
  • Longer focal lengths — tighter framing on small targets
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — Canon EOS R7
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
OM System OM-1 II — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 3.99° × 2.98°Scale: 2.76"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.25° × 0.93°Scale: 0.86"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.50° × 0.37°Scale: 0.35"/px
Canon EOS R7 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.11° × 3.39°Scale: 2.64"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.60° × 1.06°Scale: 0.83"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.64° × 0.42°Scale: 0.33"/px
OM System OM-1 II — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with longer focal lengths where framing is tight.

Canon EOS R7 — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives