Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet vs Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet

Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet
Meade

Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet
Orion

EON 130mm ED Triplet

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Specifications

SpecificationMeade Series 6000 130mm ED TripletOrion EON 130mm ED Triplet
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo tripletApo triplet FPL-53
Aperture130mm130mm
Focal length910mm910mm
Native f/ratiof/7.0f/7.0
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight7.7kg7.7kg
Advantages of Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet

Closely matched on the compared specs.

Best for — Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.27° × 1.51°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.48° × 0.99°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.71° × 0.71°Scale: 0.85"/px
Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.27° × 1.51°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.48° × 0.99°Scale: 0.85"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.71° × 0.71°Scale: 0.85"/px
Meade Series 6000 130mm ED Triplet — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Orion EON 130mm ED Triplet — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives