Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Meade LX200 10" ACF vs Astro-Tech AT12RC

Meade LX200 10" ACF
Meade

LX200 10" ACF

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT12RC
Astro-Tech

AT12RC

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Key differences

-17% aperture
Slower by 2.0 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationMeade LX200 10" ACFAstro-Tech AT12RC
Optics
Typesctritchey-chretien
Optical designAdvanced Coma-FreeTruss Ritchey-Chrétien
Aperture254mm305mm
Focal length2540mm2432mm
Native f/ratiof/10.0f/8.0
Image circle
Full-frame supportNoYes
Physical
Weight13.6kg26.5kg
Advantages of Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Lighter (13.6kg vs 26.5kg) — easier to travel with
Advantages of Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • 20% more light-gathering aperture
  • Faster optics at f/8 vs f/10
Best for — Meade LX200 10" ACF
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
Best for — Astro-Tech AT12RC
  • Small galaxies, planetary nebulae, lunar & planetary detail
  • High-resolution long-exposure work
  • Faint-object imaging under dark skies
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Meade LX200 10" ACF — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.81° × 0.54°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.53° × 0.35°Scale: 0.31"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.25° × 0.25°Scale: 0.31"/px
Astro-Tech AT12RC — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.85° × 0.57°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.55° × 0.37°Scale: 0.32"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.27° × 0.27°Scale: 0.32"/px
Meade LX200 10" ACF — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Astro-Tech AT12RC — recommended user

Best suited for experienced imagers chasing detail running a permanent observatory setup.

Recommended alternatives