Astrophotoguru · Compare

cameracomparison · 2-way

Fujifilm X-H2 vs QHYCCD QHY268M

Fujifilm X-H2
Fujifilm

X-H2

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

QHYCCD QHY268M
QHYCCD

QHY268M

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Key differences

55% more resolution
Uncooled
Color vs mono

Specifications

SpecificationFujifilm X-H2QHYCCD QHY268M
Sensor
TypedslrDedicated Cooled
SensorFujifilm APS-C BSISony IMX571
Sensor techCMOSCMOS
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Sensor size23.5×15.7mm23.5×15.7mm
Diagonal28.3mm28.3mm
Pixel size3.76µm3.76µm
Resolution7728×51526280×4210
Megapixels40.2MP26.0MP
ColorYesNo
Cooling
CooledNoYes
Performance
Full well51000e⁻
Peak QE91%
Advantages of Fujifilm X-H2
  • Higher resolution (40.2MP vs 26MP)
  • One-shot color — simpler workflow
Advantages of QHYCCD QHY268M
  • Regulated cooling for long exposures
  • Mono sensor — ideal for narrowband and LRGB
Best for — Fujifilm X-H2
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • One-shot color — quick results, less processing
Best for — QHYCCD QHY268M
  • Balanced field for most refractors
  • Well-sampled deep-sky at medium focal lengths
  • Long-exposure deep-sky under any sky
  • Narrowband and LRGB workflows
Fujifilm X-H2 — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
QHYCCD QHY268M — typical FOV & scale
  • On 250mm refractor (wide)
    FOV: 5.39° × 3.60°Scale: 3.10"/px
  • On 800mm SCT reducer
    FOV: 1.68° × 1.12°Scale: 0.97"/px
  • On 2000mm SCT native
    FOV: 0.67° × 0.45°Scale: 0.39"/px
Fujifilm X-H2 — recommended user

A strong fit for photographers stepping into astro pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

QHYCCD QHY268M — recommended user

A strong fit for dedicated deep-sky imagers pairing with a broad range of focal lengths.

Recommended alternatives