Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 vs William Optics GT 102

Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED152 FCD-100

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics GT 102
William Optics

GT 102

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Key differences

+62% focal length
+49% aperture
Slower by 0.6 f-stops

Specifications

SpecificationExplore Scientific ED152 FCD-100William Optics GT 102
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FCD-100Apo triplet FPL-53
Aperture152mm102mm
Focal length1140mm703mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/6.9
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight12.0kg5.6kg
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
  • Tighter framing — 1140mm vs 703mm focal length
  • 49% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of William Optics GT 102
  • Wider field — 703mm vs 1140mm focal length
  • Faster optics at f/6.9 vs f/7.5
  • Lighter (5.6kg vs 12kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — William Optics GT 102
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.81° × 1.21°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 0.79°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.57°Scale: 0.68"/px
William Optics GT 102 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.93° × 1.96°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.92° × 1.28°Scale: 1.10"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.92° × 0.92°Scale: 1.10"/px
Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

William Optics GT 102 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a backyard imaging setup.

Recommended alternatives