Astrophotoguru · Compare

telescopecomparison · 2-way

Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 vs Vixen SD115S

Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
Explore Scientific

ED152 FCD-100

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Vixen SD115S
Vixen

SD115S

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Key differences

+28% focal length
+32% aperture

Specifications

SpecificationExplore Scientific ED152 FCD-100Vixen SD115S
Optics
Typerefractorrefractor
Optical designApo triplet FCD-100Apo doublet SD
Aperture152mm115mm
Focal length1140mm890mm
Native f/ratiof/7.5f/7.7
Image circle52mm44mm
Full-frame supportYesYes
Physical
Weight12.0kg4.8kg
Advantages of Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
  • Tighter framing — 1140mm vs 890mm focal length
  • 32% more light-gathering aperture
  • Larger image circle (52mm) — supports bigger sensors
Advantages of Vixen SD115S
  • Wider field — 890mm vs 1140mm focal length
  • Lighter (4.8kg vs 12kg) — easier to travel with
Best for — Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Best for — Vixen SD115S
  • Medium-sized galaxies and planetary nebulae
  • Full-frame astro cameras and DSLRs
Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.81° × 1.21°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.18° × 0.79°Scale: 0.68"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.57° × 0.57°Scale: 0.68"/px
Vixen SD115S — typical FOV & scale
  • With Full-frame (36×24mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 2.32° × 1.55°Scale: 0.87"/px
  • With APS-C (23.5×15.7mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 1.51° × 1.01°Scale: 0.87"/px
  • With IMX533 square (11.3×11.3mm, 3.76µm)
    FOV: 0.73° × 0.73°Scale: 0.87"/px
Explore Scientific ED152 FCD-100 — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a permanent observatory setup.

Vixen SD115S — recommended user

Best suited for intermediate imagers building a versatile kit running a portable travel rig.

Recommended alternatives